Feature Article

The Patient's Bill of Rights Act and Breast Cancer Care

There has been considerable discussion for the last two years in congress about the need for a special bill designed to protect consumers in the event they experience a serious illness. The following information is a summary of what is currently in place related to this bill which is known as the "Patient's Bill of Rights Act." In this article, you will find information that specifically relates to how this bill impacts breast cancer treatment.

Depending on who you talk to, the two versions of the Patient's Bill of Rights Act now being debated in Congress could provide a plethora of new medical benefits to patients, especially to those without access to high-quality medical care.

In general, both the House and Senate versions of the legislation establish:

While it seems unlikely that all of these provisions will survive final passage and eventually be signed into law by President Clinton, two provisions are of particular importance to breast cancer patients: Access to Specialty Care (Oncology Care), and Standards for Breast Cancer Treatment.

Access to Specialty Care

Any meaningful Patient's Bill of Rights should include a provision stating that if an individual has an illness of sufficient seriousness and complexity to require treatment by a specialist-such as breast cancer-and benefits for such treatment are provided under the insurance plan, the insurance company must provide for a referral to such a specialist.

Furthermore, this access to specialty care should include:

Standards for Breast Cancer Treatment

Any Patient's Rights legislation should require that health care plans ensure inpatient coverage with respect to the treatment of breast cancer for a period of time as determined by the attending physician rather than the insurance company. The Act should specifically mention coverage for a mastectomy, lumpectomy, or lymph node dissection for the treatment of breast cancer.

Furthermore, the Act should specify that hospital stays and treatments may be shorter if the attending physician and the patient deem it medically appropriate. As can be the case at many advanced medical facilities, certain surgical and treatment procedures can be done more efficiently on an outpatient basis, and often more effectively and in a shorter time frame and with fewer side effects. Therefore, the legislation should allow for flexibility in treatment options and recognition of advanced in treatment practices (as is the case for the Johns Hopkins Breast Center.)

Denials and Appeals

In addition to the above, any meaningful Patient's Bill of Rights Act should state that insurance companies may not deny coverage of routine patient costs for participation in clinical trials for individuals when no standard treatment is available.

Also, should access to specialty care or to an appropriate clinical trial be denied, the legislation should provide for a range of appeals and grievance procedures, including: