Current Month 2009
Article Features
  A Break from Hormone Therapy Doesnít Improve Mammograms
Cardiovascular Fitness Not Affected by Cancer Treatment
Compliance and Cost Regarding Oral Chemotherapy
Less-Toxic Drug Prolongs Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Low-Income Breast Cancer Patients Skipping Hormonal Therapy, Increasing their Risks
New Model Suggests Role of Low Vitamin D in Cancer Development
No Response to TGF-beta Correlates with Poorer Prognosis in Breast Cancer
PET Scan Able to Non-Invasively Measure Early Assessment of Treatment for Common Type of Breast Cancer
Program Focused on Body, Mind and Spirit Helps Women with Breast Cancer Cope
Researchers Identify Biological Markers That May Indicate Poor Breast Cancer Prognosis
A Radically Different Approach to Treating Early Breast Cancer
Adding SNPs to Breast Cancer Risk Model Does Not Increase Accuracy
Cancer Screening Fear is Fueled by Lack of Information
Common Chemotherapy Drug Triggers Fatal Allergic Reactions
Cost-Effectiveness of External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation
Identifying the Potential for Tamoxifen Resistance in Patients
If an Adolescent Has a Lump in Her Breast, Does She Really Need a Biopsy?
Many Breast Cancer Patients Take High Doses of Antioxidants Despite Possible Consequences
Protein Linked to Change in Tissue That Surround and Support Breast Tumors
Prototype Breast Cancer Imaging System May Improve Patient Care
Researchers Develop New Method for Breast Cancer Biomarker Discovery
Researchers Find Breast Cancer Gene Thatís Blocked by Blood Pressure Drug
Researchers Identify Four New Targets for Breast Cancer
Researchers Identify Key Gene in Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Researchers Link Pathway to Breast Cancer Stem Cells
RNA Snipped Suppresses Spread of Aggressive Breast Cancer
Scientists Identify Growth Factor as Possible Cancer Drug Target
Studies Find Patients Have Lower Health-Related Quality of Life After Cancer Diagnosis
Varying Reductions in Breast Cancer Among Poor Suggest Hormone Therapy to Blame
Vitamin A Derivative Provides Clues to Better Breast Cancer Drugs


Variability of Interpretive Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammograms among Mammography Facilities

A new study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute has found that diagnostic interpretative performance varies across mammography facilities.

Prior work demonstrated that screening mammography interpretive accuracy varies substantially by facility, but performance of diagnostic interpretation (i.e., exams performed to evaluate a clinical breast lump) was unknown. To determine if such variability exits, Sara L. Jackson, M.D., of the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle, and colleagues surveyed 45 facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium to compare mammography facility structure, organization, and interpretive processes. Analyzing data from over 28,000 diagnostic mammograms read by 118 radiologists, they assessed whether facility characteristics were associated with facility interpretive performance of diagnostic mammograms.

After adjustment for patient and radiologist characteristics, researchers found statistically significant variability for false-positive rates between facilities. False positive rates were higher at facilities reporting increased concern about malpractice.

"Analyses comparing differences among mammography facilities that do not adjust for important patient characteristics may falsely conclude that there is more facility variation in overall accuracy than what actually exists," the authors write.

SOURCE:
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, May 26, 2009

Read More of the Main Article

 
Visit the Ezine


Visit the BreastCenter

Visit the Quality Corner
Avon Breast Cancer Crusade - AVON the company for women

  This website is supported in part by an unrestricted educational grant provided by Avon