Current Month
Article Features
  Appropriate Use Criteria for Bone Scintigraphy in Prostate and Breast Cancer
Can Latina Breast Cancer Patients and Their Doctors Bridge the Cultural Divide?
Different Breast Cancer Treatment Options Vary Widely in Their Cost-Effectiveness
Different Databases, Differing Statistics on Racial Disparities in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy
Exposure to BPA Substitute, BPS, Multiplies Breast Cancer Cells
Growing Body of Evidence Supports Use of Mind-Body Therapies in Breast Cancer Treatment
Living in an Area with High Air Pollution May Impact Women’s Breast Density
New Bone-In Technique Tests Therapies for Breast Cancer Metastasis
New Guidance for Management of Aromatase-Inhibitor Related Bone Loss in Breast Cancer
New Study Finds Aggressive Breast Cancer Grows Faster in Obese Environment
Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Certain Breast Cancer Patients Predicts Low Risk for Local Metastases
Physician Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Amid Changing Guidelines
Physicians' Misunderstanding of Genetic Test Results May Hamper Mastectomy Decisions
Quest for Balance in Radiation Leads to Lower Doses
When the Doctor Recommends Against the Surgery a Breast Cancer Patients Wants


Physicians' Misunderstanding of Genetic Test Results May Hamper Mastectomy Decisions

A recent survey of over 2,000 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer found that half of those who undergo bilateral mastectomy after genetic testing don't actually have mutations known to confer increased risk of additional cancers, according to a study by researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine and four other U.S. medical centers.

Instead the women had what are known as variants of uncertain significance, or VUS, that are often eventually found to be harmless. A bilateral mastectomy is a surgical procedure in which both of a woman's breasts are removed after a diagnosis of cancer in one breast.

The finding highlights the need for genetic counselors to help both patients and physicians better understand the results of genetic testing intended to determine a woman's risk for cancer recurrence or for developing a separate cancer in her ovaries or unaffected breast.

"Our findings suggest a limited understanding among physicians and patients of the meaning of genetic testing results," said Allison Kurian, MD, associate professor of medicine and of health research and policy at Stanford. "Clinical practice guidelines state that variants of uncertain significance should not be considered to confer high cancer risk, and that patients with these variants should be counseled similarly to a patient whose genetic test is normal. However, many of the physicians surveyed in our study stated that they manage these patients in the same way as they do patients with mutations known to increase a woman's risk."

Read More of the Main Article

 
Visit the Ezine


Visit the BreastCenter

Visit the Quality Corner
Avon Breast Cancer Crusade - AVON the company for women

  This website is supported in part by an unrestricted educational grant provided by Avon